
What a sponsorship report should contain
The sponsorship report is the document that decides whether a partner renews. Most clubs produce it once a year, in the fortnight before the renewal conversation, from whatever data they can assemble.
Here is what it should contain, and what quietly destroys its credibility.
The six sections
- Delivery against contract. Every contracted deliverable, what was promised, what was delivered, and the variance. This goes first because it is the only section the sponsor definitely reads.
- Counted impressions. What you served on your own properties and logged. Website, app, newsletter, push.
- Measured exposure. Logo detections in your content, multiplied by reported reach, with the method stated.
- Estimated exposure. Attendance and broadcast modelling, clearly labelled, with the assumptions shown.
- Engagement and outcomes. Clicks, site visits, redemptions, sign-ups. Anything that indicates action rather than exposure.
- Coverage and limitations. What you could not measure and why.
Section six is the one that matters most and the one nobody includes. A report that states plainly which content could not be analysed, and what proportion that represents, reads as honest. A report with no limitations reads as marketing.

The mistakes that lose credibility
Adding counted and estimated into one number
"Your brand generated 12.4 million impressions" collapses verifiable data and modelling into a single figure. The first question from any competent media agency is how much of that is measured. If the answer is "some of it", the whole report is in trouble.
Media value equivalency without context
Converting exposure into a rand value by multiplying impressions by an advertising rate is standard practice and widely criticised. It assumes a fleeting logo is worth the same as a bought advert.
If you use it, present it alongside the raw impressions and state the CPM you applied and where it came from. Better still, use the club's own paid CPM, which is a real transaction rather than a benchmark.
Reporting only at the end of the season
An annual report tells a sponsor what happened. It does not let anyone fix anything. If a partner is 12% short on contracted impressions with six weeks to go, that is solvable. Discovered in the renewal meeting, it is not.
No traceability
Every figure should be traceable to a source. If a report says a mark appeared 1,724 times, somebody should be able to ask to see them — the images, the boxes, the confidence scores. A number nobody can audit is a number nobody trusts.
What good looks like
A monthly one-page summary, an on-demand portal the sponsor can log into, and a full report at season end. Under-delivery flagged automatically while there is still time to act.
That is what sponsorship measurement is for, and it is the difference between a renewal conversation and a lost account.
The uncomfortable rule
If you cannot report on a deliverable, do not sell it. Every unreportable item in a package is a question you will be asked and cannot answer, and it will cost you more at renewal than it earned you at signature.
The monthly one-pager
The season-end report closes the season. The monthly one-pager is what keeps a partner engaged through it, and it should take minutes to produce rather than days.
Five things, on one page:
- Delivery this month against the monthly run rate — posts, placements, impressions
- Cumulative against contract, as a percentage with a simple on-track or behind marker
- One thing that went well — a post that outperformed, a piece of content they can reuse
- Anything upcoming they should know about — a big fixture, a kit launch, an away trip
- One question, so the email requires a reply
That last item is the one clubs skip. A report that invites no response is filed unread; a question keeps the relationship two-way.
Presenting media value without losing credibility
Converting exposure into currency is standard and widely criticised. If you do it, present it correctly:
- Show the raw impressions alongside the currency figure, never instead of it
- State the CPM applied and where it came from — ideally your own ad account
- Never present it as revenue the sponsor received; it is what equivalent reach would have cost to buy
- Keep counted, measured and estimated in separate lines with separate totals
A report presenting one large blended currency figure with no method is the single fastest way to be dismissed by a media agency, and once dismissed the accurate parts go with it.
The coverage statement, and why it wins arguments
Every report should state what proportion of content was analysed and what was not. For example: 2,916 images scanned across 1,284 posts, representing 94% of published content; video was not analysed; 63 images were excluded for resolution.
This feels like an admission. It functions as a credential. An agency reading a report with a coverage statement concludes that whoever produced it understands measurement; one reading a report claiming complete capture concludes the opposite and starts testing.
What to do when the numbers are bad
Sometimes a partner under-delivered because the club did not execute. A quiet season, a digital person who left, a competition exit that removed three fixtures.
Report it anyway, early, with what you propose to do. A partner told in month four that they are 20% behind and offered a plan will usually accept it. The same partner discovering it at renewal will conclude the club is either disorganised or dishonest, and both cost you the account.
Making the report usable inside the sponsor's business
The person you deal with has to justify the spend internally, often to someone who has never been to a match. Make that easy:
- Provide a one-page summary they can forward without editing
- Include the raw figures in a spreadsheet, not only in a PDF
- Give them images they can reuse — their own branding in your content, at usable resolution
- Where you can, include an outcome rather than only exposure: clicks, redemptions, entries
A sponsorship manager who can defend the spend in their own budget meeting is a sponsorship manager who renews. That is who the report is really for.
Common questions
What should a sponsorship report contain?
Delivery against contract first, then counted impressions, measured exposure, estimated exposure, engagement outcomes, and a statement of what could not be measured.
Why does the limitations section matter?
A report stating plainly what proportion of content could not be analysed reads as honest. One with no limitations reads as marketing and gets treated as such.
How often should sponsors be reported to?
Monthly, with a full report at season end. An annual report tells a sponsor what happened but does not let anyone fix a shortfall while there is still season left.
Read next

Send us one season. We’ll show you what it was worth.
Give us your social accounts and a partner list. We come back with the exposure those partners already received, measured, before anything is signed. No cost, no commitment.